Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11866 14
Original file (NR11866 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HD
Docket No. NR1i1866-14

TA Rinse ee ONT

wk te ee

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

    

wank

NAVAL RECORD”

   

Sub]: ‘Qiienecone
REVIEW OF
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Enel: DD Form 149 dtd 1 Oct 13 w/attachment

HOMC MMRP-13/PERB memo dtd 15 Apr 14

Undtd notes reflecting basis for PERB action
-HOMC MIQ memo dtd 6 Jan 15

Subiect'’s ltr atd 14 Feb 15
Subject’s naval record

{
(
(
(
(
(

au fF WN FR

)
)
)
)
}
)

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 January to 4 March
2011 (copy at Tab &) and the gexrvice record page 11 (“Administrative
Remarks (1070}") counseling entry dated 3 Marcn 2011 with his undated
rebuttal (copies at Tab B). As indicated in enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board

(PERB) has directed removing the contested fitness report.

2. The Board, consisting of Mses. Davis, Trucco and Wilcher,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

12 March 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

“b. Enclosure (1) was filed ina timely manner.

c. The page 11 entry at issue counsels Petitioner for “Violation
of the UCMJ [Uniform Code of Military Justice] Article 92 by involving
yourself in an inappropriate relationship with the spouse of another
service member.”

d. Enclosure (3) shows that the PERB basis for removing the
contested fitness report included a finding that the page 11 entry
in question, which was cited in the fitness report, “was not
substantiated.”

e. In the advisory opinion at enclosure (4), the HOMC office
with cognizance over page 11 entries has commented to the effect that
the contested entry should stand, stating “[Petitioner] has not
provided substantial evidence to support his claim that the page 11
entry was in error or unjust.”

£. In enclosure (5}, Petitioner’s response to the advisory

opinion, he noted that he received the page 11 entry the day before
his transfer flight from his duty station in England. He objected
that he was given less than 24 hours to reply to the entry, which
allowed him no chance to consult with an attorney or a senior enlisted
advisor. He maintained that there was no inappropriate relationship
between himself and the other service member’s spouse. Finally, he
contended that had there been any proof or evidence of a violation
of the UCMJ by an inappropriate relationship, his transfer should
have been delayed, and he should have been the subject of nonjudicial
punishment or court-martial proceedings.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
notwithstanding enclosure (4), the Board finds an injustice
warranting removal of the page 11 entry. In this regard, the Board
concurs with the finding of the PERB that the entry was, as Petitioner
contends, unsubstantiated. In view of the above, the Board
recommends the following corrective action: ,
RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the

service record page 11 (‘Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated

3 March 2011 and Petitioner's undated rebuttal, which begins “I
received a Page 11 entry the day prior to flying out of the UK.” This
is to be accomplished by physically removing the page 11 on which
the entry appears and the rebuttal, or completely obliterating the
entry and rebuttal so they cannot be read, rather than merely lining
through them.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

4, It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review
and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true

and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled.

matter.

JONATHAN §. RUSKIN
Recorder

5. The foregoing report of the Board is submitted for your review

and action.
a

ROBERT J. O'NEILL

Reviewed and approved: -
3/10 Ms

LH Ube

RCBERT L. WOODS

Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower and Reserve Affairs)
1000 Navy Pentagon, Rm 40548
Washington, DC 20350-1000

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5272 14

    Original file (NR5272 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (6), MIQ again commented to the effect that the contested entry dated 6 January 2012 should stand, but further commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove the entries dated 14 December...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4745 14

    Original file (NR4745 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O! c. Enclosure (2), the report of the HOMC PERB in Petitioner's case, shows that the PERB directed removing the contested fitness report for 1 January to 27 April 2008, but commented to the effect that the five remaining reports at issue should stand. In enclosure (5), Petitioner provided new evidence in support of his new request to remove the page 11 entries dated 11 June 2010 and 12 May 2011. g. In enclosures (6) and (7),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01582-11

    Original file (01582-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No: 1582-11 10 March 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tes Secretary of the Navy ij REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06749-10

    Original file (06749-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BUG Docket No: 6749-10 11 April 2011 : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) To? That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 12 December 2008. The foregoing report of the Board is submitted for your review and action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09950-10

    Original file (09950-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geberth, McBride and Pfeiffer, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies which were available under existing law...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12640 12

    Original file (12640 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Gorenflo and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 January 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 5 August >010 and his undated rebuttal. d. That any material directed to be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03744-10

    Original file (03744-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ° ue : BUG Docket No: 3744-10 22 April 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub] :

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02803-07

    Original file (02803-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further requested removal of the fitness report for 20 November 1998 to 31 March 1999 (copy at Tab C in enclosure (1)). d. In enclosure (3), Petitioner added his request to remove the page 11 entry dated 24 March 1999. e. In enclosure (4), the HQMC PERB commented to the effect that the contested fitness report should stand. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11d (“Administrative Remarks (1070) 7”) entry dated 24 March 1999.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04770-09

    Original file (04770-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Bowen and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 July 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below shouid be taken on the available evidence of record. Region 2, MCESC [sic] [Marine Corps Embassy Security Group], Counseled this date for the following deficiencies: Violations of Article 133 and Article 134 UCMI [Uniform Code of Military Justice] relating to an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03941-11

    Original file (03941-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) office with cognizance over Petitioner's request to remove the page 11 entry and the MCTFS weight control data has commented to the effect that the page...